Weather Magnet

News
Print this story  |  Email this story  |  [+] Text Size [-]  

ODOT project slated
State agency sets sights on new venture to widen U.S. Highway 20-26 at Columbia Avenue in Malheur County



U.S. Highway 20-26 will be widened at the intersection of Columbia Avenue (shown here), about a mile north of Nyssa, to accommodate left-turn and right-turn lanes for vehicles turning off the highway onto Columbia. The project is scheduled to take place next year.
ONTARIO — Oregon Department of Transportation officials are preparing for the next major construction project in Malheur County that is designed to expand and insert turn lanes on U.S. Highway 20-26 at Columbia Avenue, about a mile north of Nyssa.

ODOT staff met with property owners near the project boundaries Tuesday in Ontario to explain the venture — set to begin next year — and the process and steps state agencies and residents must take before construction wraps up.

As planned, the highway on each side of Columbia Avenue will be widened to accommodate center left turns lanes, to go east or west off the highway and right-hand turn lanes, while retaining the lanes for through traffic. Guardrails will be installed on the east side along a drain ditch.

“We’re still busy working on design,” Leslie Hasse, ODOT right-of-way agent, said. “We have to do the appraisals.”

She said she will begin meeting with individual property owners within the next few weeks.

There are 23 properties that will be affected by the proposed project, she said.

The project will cover about one half of a mile of the highway, Rocky Pietz, who is the ODOT project team leader, said. In addition to giving up some of their property that faces the highway, property owners who have more than one entrance into their properties will be allowed to have only one, he said.

There was no opposition expressed about the project, but concerns local residents had included drainage problems, motorists going too fast, having to cross a wider highway to get to mailboxes and school children having to cross additional lanes of traffic after getting off of the school bus. Hasse said she is not sure if anything can be done about the speed if the current limit has been determined to be appropriate for the traffic.

About the mailboxes, “The postmaster will have the say where mailboxes are put,” she said.   

Regarding the water drainage issue, Hasse said she would discuss the challenge with the individual designing the project.

Another pending project in Nyssa, which has been on the docket for at least year, is the renovation of the underpass to include a larger drainage structure to keep the groundwater out, repaving and installation of a new pumping system.

However, ODOT has not yet found the funds to pay for the project.

“As soon as we have the funding, we will go out to bid,” Pietz said. “We’re ready to go,” he said, commenting the design work has been completed.

 




Comment Blog - Note: All Comments Subject To Approval

Mark & Brandy Ashby wrote on Mar 19, 2008 8:57 PM:

" Attention Regarding ODOT project Columbia Ave and HWY 20-26, We strongly disagree with Rocky Piets downplay of property owners "mere" concern about safety issues regarding adding additional turn lanes etc. on this project. Every property owner we spoke with during the mtg. on Tuesday, adamantly disagreed with the proposed speed limit on the hwy at this intersection. Residents have been here over 40 yrs. and have seen terrible accidents, yes fatalities along this corrridor. The only reason it has been safer over the last while is because there has been a lowering of the speed limit. It makes all the sense in the world to complete this project by lowering the speed to at least 40mph. We want this design and ODOT's proposal to be a sucess. It is prudently necessary to accomodate the motorists and residents who will be interacting with the new traffic scenario at this intersection! The wool hasn't been pulled over our eyes that Northwest Beef is a contributing factor to the traffic increase of semitrucks on the road.ODOT was polite to listen but could only recite rehtoric and seemed unable to provide us homeowners with a pliable solution. It was extermely dissapointing and dissatisfying. There is a feel in the air that ODOT will do what they will and our mere concerns aren't adequate enough to warrant a reasonable and sensible change.A simple adjustment regarding the speed will make this a "win-win" situation for all involved. (Yes, we would LOVE to have sidewalks as well in this residential stretch of the road.The road people only smirked at that idea.) There are enough families with young children in this area now that it seems utterly absurd to not accept our strongly voiced request. It seems better for ODOT'S corner to allow a suitable safety solution for the inhabitants of the immediate area. We are merely people who are like everybody else. Granparents, moms and dads, people carrying on normal everyday lives. We have homes, jobs, businesses, and farms. We are a community who advocate for the health and safety of our families. We , and I feel extremely confident in voicing this onbehalf of the other homeowners involved, we demand a better solution! IT is unacceptable but could be solved with a positive outcome for all. Plain and simple. We demand the lower speed limit for all people using this section of highway so close to town. All you have to do is come out and get a take on the situation yourself. It would be straight forward to you even if you weren't in our shoes. Where is ODOT's appeal to Malheuer Co. safety commision? Hmmmm? Seems easy to me. I believe our taxpayers dollars could be handled in a better manner by reducing the speed and thus reducing the budget for the needed improvements and widening of the roads. Less speed='s safer situation for kids getting on and off the schoolbus, semi-trucks with full loads, motorists, farm tractors with equipment and their harvest yields, and elderly people simply getting their mail. We all share this problem. I believe the ODOT proposal hasn't solved a problem but only created an alarming situation for drivers in a residential area. Please help by providing our voice a better chance to be heard. I feel solutions can be agreed upon and everybody can get a better nights sleep over it. "


TERMS OF USE

Those who post comments are accountable for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they furnish. While we encourage writers to utilize this service on our Web site, we also strongly suggest they treat it as public forum where good taste counts. We reserve the right to decline for approval objectionable material from these blogs.

Writers that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments - such as racists language, threats or comments unrelated to the story - will not be approved for the blogs. Also, entries that are unsigned or "signatures" by someone other than the actual writer will not be approved.

While writers can still post anonymously, we strongly suggest that they do not do so.

Opinions, guidance and other information expressed in Argus Observer story blog comments and on the Argus Observer blogs represent the individuals' own views and not necessarily those of the Argus Observer. The Argus Observer furnishes this type of forum and does not endorse and is not accountable for statements or advice from anyone other than an designated Argus Observer spokesperson.


(optional)
   

Classifieds
Place a classified ad

Community Calendar
November 2008
S M Tu W Th F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30

» This Week's Events
» Submit an Event
Click to View All Events

Business Directory
Find a business near you
Business Type

OR Business Name

Web Search
Google
 

Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.

Copyright © 2008 Argus Observer - www.argusobserver.com. All rights reserved. | Unathorized reproduction is prohibited.