Coquille residents hope lot will go to the dogs

By Jolene Guzman, Staff Writer
Wednesday, March 19, 2008 | 10 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font |
COQUILLE — If residents Sam and Janet Nishi and City Councilor Linda Short get their way, a part of the city near Fifth Street will go to the dogs.

Short announced the proposal to a build a fenced dog park, along with a request that the city donate the land for the park, at Monday’s City Council meeting. The approximately 50-foot by 200-foot parcel is adjacent to an existing park on Fifth Street and is on land owned by the city.

The Nishis said developing a dog park would give city residents who have dogs a great place to take their pets.

“We thought it might be something the people of Coquille might enjoy,” Janet Nishi said, adding dogs would have fun, too.

“Right now people are using the open lot,” Sam said, referring to the former Georgia-Pacific mill site.

Short and the Nishis have been working on the park for about a month, Short said. The idea was suggested to her about a year ago, but she hadn’t given it serious consideration until recently. She enlisted the Nishis, who own Coquille Cyclery and Garden, a bike, garden and pet food store in Coquille, to start a committee to plan the park. Janet said the committee has four members and is looking for more. Eventually, volunteers will be needed to help develop the park.

Sam and Janet have two other interested members in their family — Kodi and Fred, their dogs. Both shelter pups, they accompany Mom and Dad everywhere.

At work with Sam and Janet on Wednesday, Kodi, a fluffy yellow golden retriever mix; and Fred, a German Shorthaired Pointer with a graying muzzle, occupied ever-shifting spaces on the floor of the Nishi’s store.

 Kodi, carefully and quietly, watched people walk by the store. Sometimes he followed them outside, where Fred likes to “talk” to passersby. Both were at attention when they saw another dog across the street, but were gently reminded by Janet or Sam not to get too close to the road.

Janet said giving dogs a safe place to play and interact is one of the reasons she supports having a dog park in town.

“It gives them a chance to socialize with other dogs, Janet said, adding time spent with other dogs is especially good for those “only dogs” in the community.

“It makes them more whole individuals. Huh, guys?” she asked of Fred and Kodi, who responded by blinking at her a few times from their spots on the store floor.

Short wants to put the project on a quick schedule. On Wednesday, she said she would like to have the borders of the park marked for the rest of the City Council to see before next month’s council meeting. Park plans, for now, include having the city donate the land, clearing it of the brush and putting a fence around it.

“This is nice because the city is going to donate the land,” Janet said, adding not having to raise money to purchase the property will make the process easier.

The first step —the donation of the land — may happen at the next council meeting in April. Council members decided to wait to see plans before agreeing to offer the land. Once that step is out of the way, fundraising for building the fence will begin.

“It’s not going to interfere with anything that is existing,” Short said at Monday’s meeting, adding no occupied houses are located nearby.

The park would give dogs space to run, and an extra bonus — for the dogs anyway — of a small creek to splash in.

Short asked if the city could mow and maintain the park once it is established.

“I’m certainly in favor of doing what we can for the dogs,” Mayor Steve Britton said, and then asked if the city could be held liable if a person or dog were hurt while using the park.

City Manager Terence O’Connor said dog owners would still be responsible for their dogs, and the city would have no more liability than it does now. Short added Wednesday some restrictions may be placed on the park, such as not allowing unneutered male dogs in the park.

“This would provide a safe alternative for people to exercise their dogs,” Short said.
Previous Email this story to yourself or a friend Print this story Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments above are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

KC Coquille wrote on Mar 20, 2008 8:01 AM:

Gee. I didn't think the the City of Coquille needed a dog park. I thought my front yard was the official Coquille dog walk area.

I don't have any pets but everytime I mow the lawn the entire neighborhood stinks. That's 'cause of all the dog walkers allowing their cute little doggies to use my yard as a latrine.

If I see 'em and come out of the house when these responsible Coquille dog owners are walking their pooches through my yard, the people yank their dogs down the street away from my place at warp speed. Responsible dog-walkers need a dog park. . .

How about another little park in town for people?

I've yet to see a Coquille dog-walker carrying a pooper-scooper in my neighborhood.

Does the City of Coquille have a 'pooper-scooper' ordinance?

So instead, how about the City of Coquille using the 3 cent per gallon gas tax to repair potholes and sidewalks, like they said they were going to? Either that or give people back their money? Haven't seen anybody repairing streets or sidewalks in my neighborhood.

So, how about a more user friendly recycling center that's open more than 1 day (Saturday) per week?

So, how about the City of Coquille ensure their police officers are properly trained and don't accidentally maim and disable citizens, no matter how nasty and irritating those citizens may be?

So, how about the City of Coquille (after nearly 20 years) give away the GP site to retailers willing to build stores for the citizens of Coquille?

Just what this little town needs. A dog walk. I'm sure that would ensure no more dog poop in my front yard . . .

Dian Courtright wrote on Mar 20, 2008 4:23 AM:

I think a dog park at fifth street is a great idea. Other progressive communities have been able to implement Dog Parks successfully. I have faith in our local dogs & their owners. Outside my kitchen window I can see people & their dogs as they go into the GP site. It seems like everyone is having such a grand time! Sometimes I can see the happy & contented smiles on the dogs faces as they leave the area. It always puts a smile on my face.

Citizen wrote on Mar 19, 2008 10:42 PM:

Is this the property on the baxter side of the park? I can remember playing at the 5th Street Park in 1973. That was back when there seemed to be a lot more community pride. Children could go there without parents and be safe. In an age where people stay in their homes surfing the web it would be nice to see more of them leave their comfort of their homes and mingle in a common place for whatever the reason.

An argument could be made that it makes little sense to build a park along an ambulance route. How many children or adults have been struck by an ambulance, police car, paramedic, or anxious husband and father to be rushing to witness a birth, or a relative hurridly making their way to the emergency room to say farewell to a loved one who may have been taking their final breaths.

Perhaps public schools should open their grounds to dog walkers. It seems many people don't have a reason to pass bond measures as all their children have graduated. If they could spend some leisure time on these public ground just maybe they may be inclined to vote yes when asked to support educating the children the walk the same streets they walk their doggies on.

It seems like perhaps we are worried about only that which we are told to worry about and we aren't using the good sense we are born with.


pril wrote on Mar 19, 2008 4:50 PM:

Plenty of other places have dog parks and no major issues with them, LC. Those are two issues, not "a lot".

beebsie wrote on Mar 19, 2008 4:39 PM:

Bandon's dog park works well - maybe that's because the people and dogs in Bandon are more civilized. Three cheers for Janet and Sam. Forget the naysayers.

Nick wrote on Mar 19, 2008 4:22 PM:

This isn't the worst idea in the world. However, I hope that anyone using that park knows how to control their pet and has it trained, especially to be very social.

There are an amazing number of people who, in communities without dog parks, think all dogs are fine to take to these places. And that just is not the case.

none wrote on Mar 19, 2008 2:51 PM:

Perhaps folks shouldn't be allowed to walk on the sidewalks downtown either. A person might trip or they might not like a person on the other side of the street. The dangers are endless. I say we stop everything everywhere!

Coquille resident wrote on Mar 19, 2008 12:49 PM:

This would be a great addition to Coquille. You never know when a lot of things are going to happen until it's too late; ie, kids fighting on a playground, but fear of the 'what if's' isn't a good reason to kill such a fantastic idea.

Sandra wrote on Mar 19, 2008 12:14 PM:

Why should the city be responsible for injuries? If one cannot control one's pet, one should not have said pet. If my dog injures someone, I am responsible whilst I am in the park. If one's dog is agressive, one should know better to take it off a leash or out in public if one cannot handle the pet.

LC wrote on Mar 19, 2008 10:37 AM:

I see a lot of issues with this proposed dog park. #1 - the City will not be responsible for any injuries to people or animals. #2 - not all dogs get along and there is no way to tell until it is too late. In short, it certainly would not be a safe alternative for people to exercise their dogs.

(optional)
   

Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Editors Note | BlogThe World Forums

Most Popular


» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections